My Photo
Blog powered by Typepad
Member since 05/2005

« Rolling Stone Profiles John Rendon | Main | Venezuela Offers Cheap Heating Oil to US Publics (Added 11/26: LA Elections) »

Comments

Atlantic

"It does seem plausible that Bush meant any reference to bombing Al Jazeera as a joke"

Shouldn't this kind of humor be of concern?

Imagine Bush and Blair are not two statesmen who want to bring freedom of speech, a free press and democracy and the rule of law to the Middle East, but instead are two highschool teachers, who teach an ethics, or philosophy or civics class. During the class they talk about some high and mighty moral principles. And just after class, when both of them are still in the highschool building, one is telling the other: "I really want to f*** student xyz."

Most students, parents and other highschool teachers, who overheard this "joke" would be concerned.

In fact the highschool teacher could loose his job.

Even a highschool student who jokes about killing his classmates faces expulsion from school or even criminal charges.

You quote the Mirror: "A Government official suggested that the Bush threat had been "humorous, not serious.""

They mean a British gov official, right?
The White House would be extremely stupid to say that Bush was indeed joking about this.

Let's hope the Mirror got it wrong.

Atlantic

"The story also gives a good example of the way that public image and context can give a story wings. There are a lot of people who will find this story credible because they already have a fixed image of Bush as a bellicose man."

I agree. It helps to reinforce prejudices.

However, even if you don't have consider Bush a bellicose man and have any particular prejudices against him, you would be concerned about such "humor." Even parents, who like their daughters highschool teacher, would be concerned, if this teacher jokes about wanting to f*** some highschool student.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Search Posts with Google:


Available through Amazon.com: